Can I Get My Mitts on a Dictionary? Is there an etymologist in da house?
So, this week, there was a Republican presidential "debate"... That is, if you can debate with 14 different people all yammering and saying nothing. As a point of digression, I like what Jon Stewart has done in naming this "Clusterfick to the Whitehouse."
Now, politicians and celebrities and those in the spotlight often come up with responses to questions that make no sense... given our current administration, nothing should really come as a surprise. But I was a little taken aback by Gov'nah Mitt Romney's blantant misuse of two (not one, but TWO) phrases in one sentence.
Question: We've lost 3,400 troops; civilian casualties are even higher, and the Iraqi government does not appear ready to provide for the security of its ownDude, I don't even know where to go with this... sadly, of the others running under the guise of Repiblicanism, he seems the most articulate and coherent of the group. Not that articulate and coherent, or even the ability to use words correctly are of mass importance to the Republican party. After all, Mitt was probably just trying to relate to the masses... you know, the children that weren't "left behind" and not the ones pandering from door to door with a Bible spreading the true word of Jesus.
country. Knowing everything you know right now, was it a mistake for us to invade Iraq?
Romney's Response (partial): Well, the question is kind of a non sequitur, if you will, and what I mean by that — or a null set.
Super Genius Rating: 3
Labels: political debate, religion, super genius
